Allowed

Shadeed Bhagat Singh Memorial Shiksha Samiti and Anr. v. Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Delhi HC19 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/2533/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking reconsideration of a pending application for D.El.Ed. course recognition. Court allowed petition, directing respondent to process application ignoring state ban and dispose within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed; directed to reconsider petitioner's application dated 31.12.2012 and dispose within four weeks subject to depositing Rs. 20,000/- with Delhi High Court Staff Welfare Fund.

Shadeed Bhagat Singh Memorial Shiksha Samiti and Anr… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2533/2018 & C.M.No.10450/2018

¶4

SHADEED BHAGAT SINGH MEMORIAL SHIKSHA SAMITI

¶5

AND ANR. ..... Petitioner

¶6

Through Mr.Amitesh Kumar with Ms.Binisa Mohanty, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

NATIONAAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through Ms.Monika Arora with Mr.Kushal Kumar, Advs.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 19.03.2018

¶13

Vide the present petition, the petitioner/Institute has prayed for a direction to the respondent to reconsider its application dated 31.12.2012 for the grant of recognition to conduct D.El.Ed. course, which was returned by respondent No.2 vide letter dated 20.09.2013.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the said application was returned only on the ground of the ban imposed by the State of Haryana for opening of new institutes for the D.El.Ed. course during that period.

¶15

Issue notice. Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate who appears on advance notice for the respondents fairly submits that the respondents have taken a decision to process all the applications which were

¶16

submitted by the Institutes before the imposition of the ban by the State Government.

¶17

Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that keeping in view the fact that the petitioner’s application was returned over 4 years ago, the respondents may be given adequate time to examine and process the same as per law.

¶18

Subject to petitioner’s depositing Rs.20,000/- with Delhi High Court Staff Welfare Fund, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 31.12.2012 subject to the petitioner meeting all other prescribed eligibility criteria and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from today. It is made clear that the petitioner’s application would not be rejected on the ground of there being a ban imposed by the State of Haryana for opening of such educational Institutions.

¶19

The petition alongwith pending application stands disposed of with the above directions.

¶20

REKHA PALLI, J

¶21

MARCH 19, 2018 sr

Shadeed Bhagat Singh Memorial Shiksha Samiti and Anr. v. Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shadeed Bhagat Singh Memorial Shiksha Samiti and Anr. v. Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Gopal Sharma Vs Government of India and Anr.

Entertainment Television Network Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Anr.

Pawan Kumar Vs Staff Selection Commission

Satyendra Kumar Vs Maharaja Agarsain Public School (Recognized) & Anr.

Raj Degree College Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Milap Chand and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Daksh Bassi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ashish Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Khan Mohammed Khalid Vs Jay Karan Singh & Ors.

M. Avais Musvee Vs Jay Karan Singh Jt. Director General of Foreign Trade and Ors.

Master Aditya Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Anshveer Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Integrated Education Society and Anr. Vs Nationaal Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Amrita Anand Vs Universit of Delhi & Ors.