Petitioner sought writ to stop unauthorized construction. Respondent informed property was sealed per Supreme Court directions. Petitioner withdrew the petition, which was allowed.
Petition allowed by withdrawal; applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
..... Petitioner
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Adv. with Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
CM No. 9442/2018
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2284/2018 & CM No. 9441/2018
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:-
a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus/Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ/Order and/or Directions thereby directing the Respondent to stop, demolish and to take appropriate action against the unauthorized construction being carried out by the Owner at Property Bearing No. 8666, Aaraksha Road, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055; and
b. Pass any other Order/s, as this Hon’ble Court may deem
fit and proper in the interest of justice and circumstances of the case.”
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 12, 2018 /ak
SUBHASH CHANDER
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
