The petition to withdraw the writ petition was observed to be the condition precedent for the competent authority to pass its order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
MRS. POOJA SAWHNEY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Singh, Adv.
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC with Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv. for R-1 & 3 Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC with Ms. A. Manocha, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 09.03.2018 CM No. 8921/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 2159/2018, CM No. 8920/2018
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to
withdraw the writ petition to await the order of the Competent Authority on
the show cause notice dated November 29, 2017. The writ petition and the
application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MARCH 09, 2018 /ak
POOJA SAWHNEY
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
