Hon'ble Justice Suresh Kumar Kait granted the petitioners permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order of 30.10.2018 and filed a fresh petition.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
M/S BRANDAVAN FOOD PRODUCTS AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish K. Bishnaoi, Ms. Tanvi Sapra and Mr. Ashutosh Shandilya, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advs. for Railways. Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Standing Counsel for IRCTC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R
% 12.11.2018
Mr. Bhardwaj, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the representations made by the petitioners are disposed of by the respondents vide order dated 30.10.2018. In view of the said order, petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging this order dated 30.10.2018 along with the other issues which have been raised in the present petition.
Permission is granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Petitioners shall continue to pay the admitted licence fee amount and the petition shall be filed within two weeks from today.
Till then, Respondents shall not take coercive steps against the petitioners.
Order dasti under signatures of Court Master.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 12, 2018 rd
M/S BRANDAVAN FOOD PRODUCTS AND ANR.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
