The learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty to file afresh.
Liberty to file afresh was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
Through: Mr. R.K. Saini and Mr. Harpawan Kumar Arora, Advocates.
versus
| UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AN | D ORS. | ..... | Respondents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Through: | Mr. Mohinde | r J.S. | Rupal, Mr. P |
| Newmai and |
Ms. |
Slomita Rai, |
|
| Advocates for | R-1. | ||
| Mr. Apoorv | Kurup, | Mr. Avanish | |
| Rathi and | Mr. A | .C. Boxipotra, | |
| Advocates for | R-2. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 02.11.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave of this court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh.
Accordingly, this writ petition and the accompanying application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 02, 2018 rd
DR. M. A. SIKANDAR
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
