The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Petition and applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
MANISH RANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent-GNCTD Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC and Mr. Devesh Dubey, Advocate for respondentDSSSB
Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh and Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R
% 07.03.2018
There is an office objection regarding the maintainability of this petition.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi to seek the relief as claimed in this petition.
In view of aforesaid, this petition and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Dasti.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
MARCH 07, 2018
s
MANISH RANA
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
