Allowed

Ganesh Seth & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC12 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/2122/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a declaration that land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had lapsed. The court held that since neither possession nor compensation was tendered prior to the 2013 Act, the proceedings are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2).

What did the court decide?

Declared that the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with respect to the subject land are deemed to have lapsed.

Ganesh Seth & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Judgment: 12^th March, 2018

¶4

- W.P.(C) 2122/2016

¶5

GANESH SETH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.S.K.Rout and Mr.Aman Mehrotra, Advts.

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Ruchika Rathi, Adv. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Kartik Jindal, Adv. for DDA.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

¶10

G.S.SISTANI, J. (ORAL)

¶11

This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated with respect to land of the petitioners measuring (0-19 biswas) bearing Khasra No.409/75 situated in the revenue estate of village Dhirpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as „the subject land‟) is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the „2013 Act‟). Counsel for the petitioners submits that in this case neither physical possession of the subject land has been taken nor the compensation has been tendered.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioners contends that in this case a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter

¶13

W.P. (C) No.2122/2016

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

referred to as „the Act‟) was issued on 21.12.1971. A Section 6 declaration was made on 22.07.1972 and thereafter an Award bearing no.48/78-79 was passed by the Land Acquisition Collector on 27.03.1979. Counsel for the petitioners relies on Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act in support of his submission that as per the aforesaid Section, in case the award has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of the Act and either possession has not been taken or compensation has not been tendered, the acquisition proceedings would deem to have lapsed. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the award was rendered as far back as in the year 1979 and till date the petitioners continue to remain in the actual physical possession of the subject land and compensation has also not been tendered to the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on the counter affidavit filed by the LAC, as per which, compensation has not been paid to the petitioners.

¶16

Counsel for the LAC has relied on para 9 of the counter affidavit so filed, which is reproduced as under:

¶17

“9. That the Land Acquisition Collector passed an Award bearing No.48/78-79 dated 27.03.1979 and it is submitted that the physical possession of the land bearing Khasra No.409/75 (0-19 Biswas) could not be taken nor the compensation of the same could be paid.”

¶18

¶19

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

The counter affidavit filed by the LAC leaves no room for doubt that in this case neither physical possession has been taken nor compensation has been tendered. Thus, the case of the petitioners is covered by the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the 2013 Act.

¶21

W.P. (C) No.2122/2016

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

Resultantly, since the award having been announced more than five years prior to the commencement of the 2013 Act and neither compensation has been tendered to the petitioners nor physical possession has been taken, the petitioners are entitled to a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with respect to the subject land are deemed to have lapsed. It is ordered accordingly.

¶24

The petition stands disposed of.

¶25

C.M.9114/2016 (stay)

¶26

The application stands disposed of in view of the order passed in the writ petition.

¶27

G.S.SISTANI, J.

¶28

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.

¶29

MARCH 12, 2018 rb

¶30

W.P. (C) No.2122/2016

¶31

Page 3 of 3

Ganesh Seth & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Seth & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

F.G. Runda Vs Air India Ltd.

Union of India & Anr. Vs S.K. Verma

Rakesh Kapoor Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Sarah J. Chhotray Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sukhmani Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr.

Satyendra Kumar Vs Maharaja Agarsain Public School & Anr.

Voice of Ex Servicemen Society and Ors. Vs Director General of Resettlement Department of Ex Serviceman Welfare Ministry of Defence

Anil Sanghi Vs Income Tax Officer

Rishi Pal Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Ram Prasad Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Brij Mohan Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Rohtash Vs Union of India & Anr.

Varsha Rani Garg Vs Union of India & Anr.

Shri Shyam Singh and Ors. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.