Petitioner counsel wished to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the writ petition along with the pending application as withdrawn.
The writ petition and pending application are dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Ms.Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate for R-1 & R-2/North DMC with Mr.Naved Alam, LI, KBZ, North DMC and Mr.Himant, LI, KBZ, North DMC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Counsel for the petitioner submits on instruction that he wishes to withdraw the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition along with pending application is dismissed as withdrawn.
G. S. SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MARCH 12, 2018 afa
Shri Shyam Singh and Ors.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
