Petitioners, part-time teachers seeking parity with regular teachers, approached the High Court after receiving no response to their representation within six weeks.
Direction to respondent Punjab Academy to effectively consider and decide the petitioners' Representation within six weeks by a speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: January 09, 2018
SMT. RANI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate
versus
PUNJAB ACADEMY AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Nemo
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R (ORAL)
W.P.(C) 206/2018
Page 1 of 2
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
JANUARY 09, 2018 s
W.P.(C) 206/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim work order and relief of parity with regular teachers should be granted to part-time teachers working with Punjab Academy.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Durraj Fatima Naqvi and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.Applied¶1
W.P. (C) 13296/2009 titled Durraj Fatima Naqvi and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Rani and Ors.
Punjab Academy and Ors.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
