Allowed

Mewar University v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Delhi HC9 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/2034/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the petitioner's application to continue the writ petition regarding recognition for a B.P.Ed course, directing the respondent to reconsider the application without granting State ban as a ground for rejection.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondent to reconsider the petitioner's application dated 07.10.2012 within four weeks, excluding State ban as a ground for rejection, subject to a deposit of Rs.10,000/- by the petiti

Mewar University Vs National Council for Teacher… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~25

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 2034/2018 MEWAR UNIVERSITY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Amitesh Kumar with Ms.Binisa Mohanty & Ms.Priti Kumari, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Monika Arora, Adv.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶8

O R D E R % 09.03.2018 CM No. 9013/2018

¶9

This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking disposal of the present petition in the light of the earlier orders passed by this Court in similar facts and circumstances.

¶10

Issue notice. Ms.Monika Arora, learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice and does not oppose the application.

¶11

In view of the similar directions passed by this Court in WP (C) No.7337/2017, WP(C) No.135/2018 & others, the present application is allowed. The next date of hearing i.e. 04.04.2018, stands cancelled.

¶12

¶13

Vide the present petition, the petitioner/Institute has prayed for a direction to the respondent to reconsider its application dated 07.10.2012 for the grant of recognition to conduct B.P.Ed. course, which was returned by respondent No.1/NCTE vide letter dated

¶14

23.10.2013.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the said application was returned unactioned only on the ground of the ban imposed by the State of Rajasthan for opening of new institutes for the B.P.Ed. course during that period.

¶16

Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate who appears on advance notice for the respondents fairly submits that the respondents have taken a decision to process all the applications which were submitted by the Institutes before the imposition of the ban by the State Government.

¶17

Learned counsel for the respondent, however, submits that keeping in view the fact that the petitioner’s application was returned over 4 years ago, the respondents may be given adequate time to examine and process the same as per law.

¶18

Subject to petitioner’s depositing Rs.10,000/- with Delhi High Court Staff Welfare Fund, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to reconsider the petitioner’s application dated 07.10.2012 subject to the petitioner meeting all other prescribed eligibility criteria and dispose of the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from today. It is made clear that the petitioner’s application would not be rejected on the ground of there being a ban imposed by the State of Rajasthan for opening of such educational Institutions.

¶19

The petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

¶20

DASTI.

¶21

REKHA PALLI, J

¶22

MARCH 09, 2018/ gm

Mewar University v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mewar University v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs Director (Discipline), Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (Icai) and Anr.

Rajeev Sharma Vs UOI & Ors.

O.K. Yadav and Anr. Vs University of Delhi and Ors.

Sh. Jarnail Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Bsc C&C Jv Vs Union of India, & Ors.

Jug Lal Sharma Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Parivartan Foundation Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Kuldeep Singh and Anr. Vs East Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Kamran Ali Tariq Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sh. Harsh Mathur Vs University of Delhi and Anr.

J.R. Kissan College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Lokesh Parashar Vs New Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.

Shaheed Captain D Kkhola Education & Charitable Trust Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

K.D. College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.