Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. Court granted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of pending application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
SH. HARSH MATHUR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Siddhant Rai Sethi, Adv.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr.Prang Newmai & Ms.Slomita Rai, Advs. for R-1.
Ms.Avnish Ahlawat & Mr.N.R. Singh, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 08.03.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition.
As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The pending application also stands disposed of.
REKHA PALLI, J
MARCH 08, 2018
gm
Harsh Mathur
University of Delhi and Anr.
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
