The petitioner's counsel appeared without instructions and sought a discharge. The court discharged counsel and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, disposing of the pending application.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and the pending application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
MOHINDER AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through Mr Sargam Narula, Advocate.
versus
CANARA BANK & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr Aakash Sehrawat, Advocate for R1. Mr H.S. Parihar, Mr Kuldeep S. Parihar, Advocates for RBI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 01.08.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 01, 2018 pkv
Mohinder Aggarwal & Anr.
Canara Bank & Ors.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
