The petitioner moved this Court to withdraw her petition and accompanying applications regarding possession taken over in execution of an ex-parte decree subsequently set aside. The High Court permitted the withdrawal with liberty to move a review application.
Petition and applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move review application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv.
versus VIKAS SINGH MALIK ..... Respondent Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 05.02.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition and the accompanying applications with liberty to move review application with reference to the fact that possession was taken over in execution of ex-parte decree which was set aside.
The petition and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed, granted.
R.K.GAUBA, J
FEBRUARY 05, 2018 nk
GEETA DEVI
VIKAS SINGH MALIK
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
