Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and accompanying applications. The Court granted the withdrawal with liberty to move a review application.
Petition and applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move a review application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
RAJ KULDEEPKAUR BOPARAI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Kawaljit Kochar, Advocate.
versus
JASPAL SINGH SHERGILL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits she may be allowed to withdraw the petition and the accompanying applications with liberty to move a review application explaining the reasons why the document could not be submitted earlier after a copy thereof had been obtained in the year 2012.
The petition and the accompanying applications stand dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed, granted.
R.K.GAUBA, J
FEBRUARY 02, 2018 srb
RAJ KULDEEPKAUR BOPARAI
JASPAL SINGH SHERGILL & ORS
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
