Disposed
Lal Chand v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1924/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Tushar Sannu, Advocate for respondent/North MCD. Mr.Anjum Javed, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R D E R % 05.04.2018
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been vending at Gali No.2732/24, Near COBB, New Diamond Mall, Ajmal Khan Road, Beadonpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi for the past many years. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is being harassed by the official of the respondent and is not allowed to vend. Counsel, however, submits that the rules of the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules, 2017 have been notified on 10.01.2018 and he would approach the TVC as and when it is constituted and merely because he may not be found vending at the spot at the time of survey, that should not be a ground to reject his case.
Counsel for the respondent without admitting any of the averments made in the writ petition submits that if the petitioner makes an application with supporting documents before the TVC, the same would be considered in accordance with law and merely because the petitioner is not found squatting, that itself alone would not be a ground to reject the case of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the following agreed directions:-
We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter and this order is being passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties.
The writ petition alongwith pending application is disposed of.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
APRIL 05, 2018/ssc W.P.(C) 1924/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Chand
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court