MCD v. Rajpal and 232 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar General of Delhi allowed an adjournment on the request of respondent's proxy counsel who filed a Labour Court application for modifying a dated order.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment renotified on 29.08.2019.
What the court decided
$~
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 170/2011 MCD ..... Petitioner Through None
versus
RAJPAL AND 232 ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha proxy for Mr. Varun Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
SH. DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, REGISTRAR GENERAL
O R D E R % 25.07.2019
Proxy counsel for the respondent requests for adjournment on the ground that he has filed LPA for the modification of the order dated 02.07.2019 passed by the Hon’ble Court.
At request, renotify on 29.08.2019.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA REGISTRAR GENERAL
JULY 25, 2019 ss
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MCD
- respondent
RAJPAL AND 232 ORS
Coram
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court