The High Court of Delhi permitted the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file afresh, consequently dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
SUMIT YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandu and Mr. Siddhart Tyagi, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Siddharth Singh, Adv. for R-1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 12.12.2018
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh.
Permission granted with liberty as prayed.
Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
DECEMBER 12, 2018 gb
SUMIT YADAV
UNION OF INDIA
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
