Petitioners, alleging to be street vendors, sought a direction to the Town Vending Committee to survey their area and consider their names. The petition was dismissed after having been withdrawn by the petitioners during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
SH. PANKAJ SINGH AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.S.N.Thakur and Mr.Rakesh Tiwari, Advocates.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.D.S.Mehandru, ASC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra, Advocates for R-1/NDMC. Mr.Anjum Javed, ASC, GNCTD with Mr.Faran Ahmed and Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocates for R-3. ASI Rajpal from PS-Sarojini Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
CM APPL. No.51030/2018 (exemption)
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13149/2018
The petitioners claim to be regular street vendors and have been vending around Sarojini Nagar Market area. They seek a direction to the Town Vending Committee (TVC) that their area be surveyed and their names be considered.
Mr.Peechara, learned counsel for respondent disputes the averments
made in the writ petition and submits that the petition lacks material particulars and, thus, the same should be dismissed.
Mr.Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would approach the TVC first and if necessary they would approach the Court.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
JYOTI SINGH, J DECEMBER 05, 2018 ssc W.P.(C) 13149/2018 Page 2 of 2
Pankaj Singh and another
New Delhi Municipal Council
G.S.Sistani
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
