Petitioner approached court regarding action taken against him on account of complaints. Court dismissed the petition as not pressed, granting liberty to approach again if necessary.
Petition dismissed as not pressed; liberty to approach Court again if necessity arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
BIMLESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocates
versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, standing counsel for DDA and Mr.Rajeev Kr.Jha and Ms.Komal Sorout, Advts.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 03.12.2018
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been informed that on account of certain complaints received against the petitioner, action was taken again him. He further submits that he would approach the concerned officer and seek appropriate remedy.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach this Court again, if the necessity so arises.
G.S.SISTANI, J
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 03, 2018 rb/
Bimlesh Kumar
Commissioner of Police
G.S. Sistani
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
