The High Court disposed of the writ petition, recognizing that arguments were heard on the merits rather than mere interim relief, and granted liberty to approach the Tribunal for corrections.
Petition disposed with liberty to approach Tribunal for corrections/clarifications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
RAJNI PARMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj & Mr.M.D.Jangra, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI with Ms.Astha Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4 with Lt.Col.Jamlal Guite, AFTC
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 12.02.2018
W.P.(C) 1304/2018
page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 ‘pg’
page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 1304/2018
RAJNI PARMAR
UNION OF INDIA
HIMA KOHLI
PRATIBHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
