The petition was disposed of as not pressed since the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner were not inclined to pursue the matter further.
The petition is disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MAHENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Kartar Singh & Mr.Satya Prakash, Advocates
versus
THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF
INFORMATION & BROADCASTING AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Shahi & Mr.Harsh Pandit, Advocates for UOI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 08.02.2018
HIMA KOHLI, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
FEBRUARY 08, 2018 ‘pg’
MAHENDER SINGH
THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING AND ORS
HIMA KOHLI
PRATIBHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
