The Division Bench judge dismissed the writ petition which was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, relying on a previous judgment.
Order dismissing the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
M/S SAMRUDDHA JEEVAN FOODS INDIA LTD. AND ORS.
..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. with Mr. Ananya Pandey, Mr. C. L. Pandey, Adv.
versus
ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Ms. Mallika, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R % 16.02.2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2018 SRwt
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
T. Vinayak Ravi Reddy vs. Union of India and OthersReferred¶1
WP.(C) No. 7015/2017, T. Vinayak Ravi Reddy vs. Union of India and Others
M/S SAMRUDDHA JEEVAN FOODS INDIA LTD. AND ORS.
ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE AND ANR.
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
