The High Court of Delhi ordained disposal of the writ petition after the respondent surrendered a Rs. 1 lakh cheque to the petitioner pursuant to a settlement, directing the respondent to ensure its honor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
MADAN LAL YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Milind Bharadwaj, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
M/S. HALDIRAM MARKETING PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Basant Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Ratnesh Kumar Legal Adviser along with Mr.S.K. Jain, A/R and Mr. S.K. Mishra, in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 13.04.2018
VINOD GOEL, J.
APRIL 13, 2018
“sandeep”
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition in settlement terms needs to be disposed of upon handing over a cheque.
Madan Lal Yadav
M/S. Haldiram Marketing Pvt Ltd
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
