The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition after the respondent surrendered a settlement cheque of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the petitioner through counsel for encashment.
Ruling that petition is disposed; respondent must ensure cheque is honoured.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
MAHENDR SAHU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Milind Bharadwaj, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
M/S. HALDIRAM MARKETING PVT TLD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Legal Adviser along with Mr. S.K. Jain, A/R and Mr. S.K. Mishra, in person.
Mr. Basant Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
% 13.04.2018
VINOD GOEL, J.
APRIL 13, 2018 “sandeep”
Mahend Sahu
M/s. Haldiram Marketing Pvt Tld
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
