Dismissed
Vijay Kumar Bansal and Anr. v. Land and Development Office and Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/12311/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
| VIJAY KUMAR BANSAL A Through: versus |
ND ANR ..... Petitioners Mr.Preet Pal Singh with Ms.Priyam Mehta, Advocates with petitioners in person. |
|---|---|
| LAND AND DEVELOPMEN Through: |
T OFFICE AND ANR..... Respondent Mr.B.S. Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Satya Ranjan Swain, GP & Mr.Kamaldeep, Advocate for UOI. |
| Ms.Puja Kalra with Mr.Gurmehar S. Sistani & Mr.Virendra Singh, Advocates for R-2 |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
% 10.01.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the letter dated 20.12.2017 issued by respondent no.2, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition.
Upon the petitioner fulfilling the conditions mentioned in the aforesaid letter dated 20.12.2017, it is expected that the respondent no.2 will take expeditious steps in accordance with its aforesaid communication.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition is granted and the same is dismissed as withdrawn. The pending application also stands disposed of.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 10, 2018/ gm
Vijay Kumar Bansal
ND
Land and Development Office
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court