The petition was dismissed as infructuous as the Revenue had resolved the underlying grievances, rendering the writ petition unnecessary.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to approach the Court if an adverse order is made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
NCS PEARSON, INC. ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Deepak Pandey with Ms. Pallavi. S. Kansal and Sh. Saurabh Kansal, Advocates.
versus
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & ORS.
..... Respondents Through : Sh. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Tejaswita, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4. Sh. Amit Bansal, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Sh. Nitin, representative, for Respondent No.4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 16.11.2018
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance which led to the initiation of these proceedings have been rendered infructuous since the Revenue has resolved the issues and controversies. He, however, seeks liberty to approach the Court in the event an adverse order is made.
Liberty granted.
The writ petition and the pending application are accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
PRATEEK JALAN, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018/ajk
NCS Pearson, Inc.
Secretary, Department of Revenue
S. Ravindra Bhat
Prateek Jal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
