Allowed

Valco Industries Ltd. v. Value Added Tax Officer & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Nov 2018W.P.(C)/12279/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's plea for issuing C-Forms to rectify discrepancies in VAT returns. The court directed the VAT authorities to release the forms within two weeks, subject to the outcome of a Special Leave Petition staying a similar precedent.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to release C-Forms within two weeks and ensure appropriate surety/security stock is given.

Valco Industries Ltd. Vs Value Added Tax Officer & Anr. — Income Tax | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~24

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12279/2018

¶4

VALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Sudhir Sangal and Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Shadan Farasat, ASC with Sh. Ahmed Said, Advocate. Ms. Rajni, LA with Sh. Meena, VATO.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 16.11.2018

¶9

Issue notice. Sh. Shadan Farasat, Advocate accepts notice.

¶10

With consent, the matter was heard finally.

¶11

The petitioner’s grievance is that its attempts to correct a small error or discrepancy for the quarter 01.01.2015 to 31.03.2015 resulted in a more grave error in the total amount in the original assessment towards inward transaction, by mistake and oversight, was showed in the outward transaction and, therefore, sought to rectify it, with a direction to the VAT authorities to issue appropriate F forms. This was met with by the impugned letter/order dated 27.04.2018, which indicated that the discrepancy ought to have been corrected within a year following the year of such tax period in accordance with Section

¶12

Page 1 of 3

¶13

¶14

At the outset, it was pointed out – and the Revenue did not dispute - that in somewhat similar circumstances – when the Court had to deal with the interplay between the incorrect filing of DVAT returns which resulted in issuance of C-Forms consequent upon rectification, in the judgment of the Court in Indian Oil Corporation v. Commissioner, VAT [W.P.(C) 2633/2017, decided on 11.04.2017], the Court had directed the DVAT authorities to grant relief and issue appropriate C-Forms.

¶15

The Revenue, which is represented on advance notice points out that similar cases are pending on the file of the Court and that the decision in Indian Oil Corporation (supra) was stayed upon a Special Leave Petition by the Revenue (SLP No.13928/2017 - Commissioner, VAT Delhi & Ors vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. ) by an order dated 01.05.2017.

¶16

In the light of the submissions made and following the final judgment of this Court of 11.04.2017 in W.P. (C) 2633/2017 ( Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Commissioner, VAT Delhi ), the petitioner is entitled to a direction of similar kind. The respondents shall release the C-Forms within two weeks to enable the appropriate correction to be made for the relevant quarters. The petitioners shall ensure that appropriate surety is given to the respondents – in addition to security stock as deemed appropriate for the release of F-Form. These directions are subject to the final outcome of proceedings in SLP(C) 13928/2018.

¶17

Page 2 of 3

¶18

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. A copy of the order be given dasti .

¶19

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

¶20

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶21

NOVEMBER 16, 2018/ajk

¶22

Page 3 of 3

Valco Industries Ltd. v. Value Added Tax Officer & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Valco Industries Ltd. v. Value Added Tax Officer & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India Vs Dr H P Singh

UOI & Ors. Vs Cental Administrative Tribunal

Kamlesh Sharma Vs UOI

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Ashok Kumar Garg

Sanjay Kumar Bhambri Vs Union of India & Anr.

Smt. Shashi Bala Raghav Vs National Thermal Power Corporation (N.T.P.C) and Anr.

Angelic Creations through Its Proprietor Sh. Gaurav Agarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of (Drawback) & Anr.

Hazara Singh Vs Delhi Devlopment Authority

UOI & Ors. Vs Cental Administrative Tribunal

Reliance Cable Industries Vs Commissioner of GST (East), Delhi

Reliance Cable Industries Vs Commissioner of GST (East) Delhi

Ncs Pearson, Inc. Vs Secretary, Department of Revenue & Ors.

Fis Global Business Solutions India Pvt. Ltd, Vs Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-3, New Delhi & Anr.

Haldor Topsoe India Private Limited Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax (East)