The petitioner challenged bank levy of merchant discount rates. The court noted the RBI circular directed banks not to pass MDR on debit cards and distinguished credit cards as contractual. The petition was disposed without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision : 20th March, 2018
AMIT SAHNI ..... Petitioner Through : Petitioner (Adv.) in person.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Anumita Chandra, Adv. for Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for R-1. Mr. H.S. Parihar and Mr. Kuldeep S. Parihar, Advs. for R-2/RBI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
W.P.(C)No.10838/2016 Page 1 of 2
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MARCH 20, 2018
aj
W.P.(C)No.10838/2016 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief regarding banks levying merchant discount rates on payments received through debit/credit cards.
Amit Sahni
Union of India
RBI
C. Hari Shankar
Gita Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
