This is a short review order where the court dismissed the petitioner's review petition. The petitioner failed to substantiate the claim that she applied for NDMC accommodation after counsel for the respondent indicated she had not applied for a flat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DR ANITA PATNAIK
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Harsh Ahuja and Mr Kushal Kumar, Advocates.
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Malvika Trivedi, Standing Counsel with Mr Tushar Sannu, ASC for New Delhi Municipal Corporation. Mr Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 28.11.2018
CM No.48881/2018
REVIEW PET.422/2018
pool.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 28, 2018 MK
Dr Anita Patnaik
New Delhi Municipal Council and Ors.
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
