Dismissed

Rajender Arya v. Rejistrar Cooperative Socity NCT Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC1 Oct 2018W.P.(C)/10494/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application to implead the petitioner's wife by amending the memo of parties in a cooperative society suit. Subsequently, a joint application for based on a settlement agreement was disposed of, binding parties to the settlement terms, leading to the dismissal of the main writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Amended memo of parties to include wife's name; Writ petition dismissed by binding parties to settlement terms.

Rajender Arya Vs Rejistrar Cooperative Socity NCT Delhi… — Cooperative Societies | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 10494/2017 and C.M. No. 42934/2017

¶4

RAJENDER ARYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCITY NCT DELHI AND ANR.

¶7

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC with Ms. Shivangi Singh and Mr. Shashank Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr. J. N. Gupta, Advocate for R-2 to 5.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶9

O R D E R % 01.10.2018

¶10

C.M. No. 45076/2017 (by the petitioner u/s 151 CPC for impleadment)

¶11

This application has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia that he may be permitted to amend the memo of parties and include the name of Mrs. Shalini Arya, wife of the petitioner No.1, whose name had inadvertently not been mentioned in the memo of parties originally filed.

¶12

Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the present application being allowed.

¶13

Accordingly, the application is allowed and disposed of. Amended memo of parties is taken on record.

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

W.P.(C) 10494/2017

¶16

C.M. No. 36248/2018 (joint application by the petitioner and the respondent No.2)

¶17

The present application has been filed by the petitioner and respondent No.2/Society stating inter alia that they have arrived at a settlement vide Settlement Agreement dated 18.8.2018, executed before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. On the last date of hearing, when the present application was listed, on perusing the Settlement Agreement dated 18.8.2018, enclosed with the application and marked as Annexure-A, it had transpired that the petitioner and the respondent No.2/Society had agreed that his name and that of his wife, Mrs. Shalini Arya, who was not a party in the memo of parties originally filed, be switched in the record of the respondent No.2/Society in the following manner:-

¶18

Mr. Rejender Arya and Mrs. Shalini Arya.

¶19

On noting that Mrs. Shalini Arya was not a signatory to the Settlement Agreement and nor had she filed an affidavit in support of the said application, the matter was adjourned for learned counsel for the petitioner to file an affidavit of Mrs. Shalini Arya, for confirmation of the terms and conditions of the settlement recorded in the Settlement Agreement.

¶20

Mr. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner No.2, Mrs. Shalini Arya, has filed an affidavit dated 07.9.2018, wherein she had made a request that her husband be transposed in the joint membership by swapping his name before her’s in records of the respondent No.2 /Society.

¶21

W.P.(C) 10494/2017

¶22

Page 2 of 3

¶23

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and disposed of.

¶24

W.P.(C) 10494/2017

¶25

In view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent No.2/Society, the writ petition is disposed of along with the pending application while binding the parties to the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement dated 18.8.2018, referred to hereinabove.

¶26

HIMA KOHLI, J

¶27

REKHA PALLI, J

¶28

OCTOBER 01, 2018 ap/rkb

¶29

Page 3 of 3

¶30

W.P.(C) 10494/2017

Rajender Arya v. Rejistrar Cooperative Socity NCT Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajender Arya v. Rejistrar Cooperative Socity NCT Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pooja Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi

Naveen Kumar Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kamal Sahai Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.

Diploma Engineers; Federation of Ispat Vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. and Ors.

Chahat Ram Vs Union of India & Anr.

Mohd Khalid Ansari Vs Union of India and Ors.

Prem Singh Vs South Delhi Municipal Corrporation

Ms.Ravinder Kaur & Ors. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Naveen Kumar Yadav Vs Union of India and Ors.

Kuldeep Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

The Director (Rl) and Ors. Vs Santosh Kumar Upadhyay

S.K. Chaudhary Vs Union of India and Ors.

Shailesh Panday Vs Shinde Deepak Arjun

Union of India Vs Randeep Singh and Ors.