An application for early hearing of writ petition C) 10407/2018 was allowed. The main writ petition was subsequently allowed to be withdrawn upon receiving specific observations from the Tribunal.
Application for early hearing allowed and granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30.
NALIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Behera with Ms. Vidushi Shubham, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 10.12.2018
C.M. No. 51735/2018
By this application the petitioner seeks early hearing of the writ petition. The application is allowed. The date already fixed stands cancelled.
W.P.(C) 10407/2018
After some arguments, Mr. Behera, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition in view of the observations made by the Tribunal in paragraph 23 of the impugned order.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
DECEMBER 10, 2018
N.Khanna
NALIN KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
VIPIN SANGHI
A. K. CHAWLA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
