Partly allowed

Moyna Ramkrishnayan Association a Teacher Training Association v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Jan 2018W.P.(C)/10230/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought recognition for a second B.Ed. unit. The Court treated the petition as a representation, directing the National Council for Teacher Education to pass a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks.

Moyna Ramkrishnayan Association a Teacher Training… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 10230/2017 &C.M. No. 41732/2017

¶4

MOYNA RAMKRISHNAYAN ASSOCIATION A TEACHER

¶5

TRAINING ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner

¶6

Through Mr.Amitesh Kumar with Ms.Binisa Mohanty, Advocate.

¶7

versus

¶8

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondent

¶9

Through None.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R

¶11

% 12.01.2018

¶12

In the present writ petition the petitioner is seeking a direction to the Eastern Regional Committee/respondent no.2 to process and decide the application of the petitioner for grant of final recognition to the remaining one unit of B.Ed course under Regulation 7(16) of NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulation 2014.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had applied for recognition of two units comprising 100 seats for the B.Ed. course, the respondent no.2 has granted recognition for only one unit i.e. 50 seats and till date has not communicated any decision regarding the second unit comprising of 50 seats. He further submits that the respondent no.2 has upto this date, not pointed out any deficiency/reason for not granting recognition for the second unit.

¶14

He therefore prays that the respondents be directed to consider the contentions raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition before taking a final decision in respect of recognition of the second unit.

¶15

In support of his aforesaid plea, the Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(C)5017/2016 tilted Sant Tapasvi Narayan Das Foundation and Anr. v. National Council for Teacher Education, W.P.(C) 3480/2017 titled East N West Foundation & Anr V. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr. and W.P.(C)5017/2016 titled Sant Tapasvi Narayan Das Foundation and Anr V. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr. and prays for similar directions.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/NCTE on advance notice is unable to either deny or admit the contentions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶17

Keeping in view the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the orders passed by this Court, the respondents are directed to treat the present writ petition as a representation and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks.

¶18

If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, he will have liberty to take legal recourse as per by law.

¶19

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶20

A copy of this order may given Dasti under the signature of Court Master.

¶21

REKHA PALLI, J

¶22

JANUARY 12, 2018/ sr

Moyna Ramkrishnayan Association a Teacher Training Association v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Moyna Ramkrishnayan Association a Teacher Training Association v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Automak Academy Vs Union of India & Ors.

International Fasteners through Its Proprietor Vs Commissioner of Customs (Export)

Pio, Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. and Anr. Vs Vishwas Bhamburkar

Tula Ram Vs Delhi Power Co.Ltd. & Anr.

Subhash Chander Khatri Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sunil Kumar Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Mrs. Sangeeta Purohit Vs State (Govt. of NCT Delhi ) and Ors.

Ms. Nirmal Yadav Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Karan Ahluwalia Vs Union of India and Ors.

Vivek College of Sciences and Hospital, Bijnor Vs Union of India

Ashok Goel Vs Land and Development Office and Anr.

Purbayan Educational Institution Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Netaji Teachers Training Institute Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Mnm Teachers Training College Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.