The High Court of Delhi allowed VAT Appeal 13/2017. The appeal and associated applications were subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant's counsel.
Allowed to withdraw the appeal and connected applications; ultimately dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 52
versus
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr R.A. Iyer, Advocates
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
O R D E R % 06.09.2017
CM 32575/2017 (exemption)
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
VAT APPEAL 13/2017 & CMs 32573/2017 (stay) and 32574/2017 (delay of 240 days)
2.Mr Rajesh Jain, learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal and the applications stating that the Appellant will seek other remedy that are available to the Appellant in accordance with law.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 rd
AGGARWAL AGENCIES PVT. LTD.
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES
S. MURALIDHAR
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
