Jitf Water Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition challenging an order requiring an additional pre-deposit of Rs. 3 crores for hearing an appeal before CESTAT. The court held that the Rs. 2.51 crores deposited during investigation was sufficient and set aside the order for further deposit.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order requiring further pre-deposit of Rs. 3 crores is set aside, and the petitioner is not required to make any further pre-deposit beyond Rs. 2.51 crores already deposited.