Atul Bhuchar v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner and respondents agreed to allow the petition to expedite the trial. The High Court, by consent, transferred pending criminal cases to another Metropolitan Magistrate requiring disposal within six months.
What did the court decide?
Transfer of CC 4993199/2016 and 4989393/2016 to Mr. J.S.Lamba with a six-month disposal target.
What the court decided
$~22.
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- TR.P.(CRL.) 3/2016
- ATUL BHUCHAR
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Advocate
versus
THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate for R2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 12.01.2017
Learned counsels are agreeable that the petition be allowed and the trial be expedited and be made time bound. This is, of course, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties on merits. Accordingly, by consent, petition is allowed and case bearing CC Nos. 4993199/2016 and 4989393/2016 pending in the court of Mr. Anurag Thakur, Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka, is transferred to the court of Mr. J.S.Lamba, Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, who is hearing case titled, ‘Karina Fincap Ltd. Vs. Atul Bhuchar’. The Metropolitan Magistrate to whom the case is transferred shall dispose of the cases preferably within six months. Neither party shall seek or be granted any undue adjournment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ATUL BHUCHAR
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
VIPIN SANGHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court