Single-judge High Court of Delhi quashed the impugned FIR after the parties reached a settlement on 06.01.2017. The complainant confirmed the settlement was voluntary and joined the prayer for quashing, leading the court to find no useful purpose in proceeding further.
The FIR No.652/2016 and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC with ASI Ramesh, PS Vijay Vihar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R
%
11.01.2017
The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking quashing of FIR No.652/2016 registered on the complaint of the complainant under Sections 323/341/34 IPC against the petitioners at Police Station Vijay Vihar.
The complainants are present in Court. They are identified by the Investigating Officer.
The petitioners have been counselled to maintain good conduct in future. They have assured to the court they will maintain good conduct in the future.
The parties have arrived at a settlement on 06.01.2017, which has been placed on record. The complainant states that they have not been subjected to any pressure or coercion and that they have entered the
settlement out of their own free will. The complainant further states that they join the prayer for quashing of the FIR in question.
Accordingly, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding further with the FIR in question and the proceedings emanating therefrom. The same are hereby quashed.
Dasti.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
JANUARY 11, 2017 sr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered under Sections 323/341/34 IPC should be quashed upon settlement and assurance of good conduct.
SHARVAN KUMAR & ORS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
