The High Court disposed of the appeal based on a settlement agreement dated 15.5.2017 reached in mediation. The agreement was treated as binding under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. Each party was left to bear their own costs.
Appeal disposed of based on settlement agreement dated 15.5.2017 treated as a binding decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
RAM MEHAR ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Kulish Tanwar, Adv.
versus
OM PRAKASH ETC. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Ghosh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 13.07.2017
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
JULY 13, 2017 ib
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Mehar
Om Prakash Etc.
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
