Allowed

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Wilson Bhati

Delhi HC9 Mar 2017RFA/191/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeals allowed on terms of a consent order. The High Court disposed of the appeals along with pending applications in terms of a previous order dated 01.12.2016 passed in connected appeals. The appellant filed a revised compilation statement.

What did the court decide?

Appeals disposed of along with pending applications in terms of the order dated 01.12.2016 passed in RFA 192/2016.

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs Wilson Bhati — Delhi HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~10 to 15.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 185/2017 and CM APPL. 6218/2017

¶4

- RFA 186/2017 and CM APPL. 6224/2017

¶5

- RFA 187/2017 and CM APPL. 6227/2017

¶6

- RFA 189/2017 and CM APPL. 6247/2017

¶7

- RFA 191/2017 and CM APPL. 6261/2017

¶8

- RFA 192/2017 and CM APPL. 6268/2017

¶9

EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR..... Appellants Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel

¶10

versus

¶11

M/S TOMAR CONSTRUCTION & CO ..... Respondent WILSON BHATI ..... Respondent SUDEEP SUBAKSH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Akhil Verma, Advocate

¶12

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

¶13

O R D E R % 09.03.2017

¶14

Appearance is entered by the counsel for the respondents in all the appeals. He states that he has received a complete set of the paper book. The money payable towards the costs imposed in the present appeals is being handed over to the counsel for the respondents.

¶15

Counsel for the respondents states that he does not have any objection to the present appeals being disposed of in terms of the same order as was passed in the other connected appeals filed by the appellant/EDMC, that were disposed of by a consent order dated 01.12.2016, passed in RFA

¶16

RFA 185/2017 and connected appeals Page 1 of 2

¶17

192/2016, being the lead case. He however states that the appellant be called upon to indicate the exact amount that would be payable to the respondents under the decree and the estimated date of payment.

¶18

Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant/EDMC states that due to bonafide inadvertence, several errors have crept in the compiled statement that has been uploaded by the EDMC on its website and a revised compilation is being prepared which shall be furnished to the counsel for the respondents in each of the present appeals, within two weeks.

¶19

Accordingly, the present appeals are disposed of along with the pending applications in terms of the order dated 01.12.2016 passed in RFA 192/2016 and the other connected appeals filed by the EDMC.

¶20

HIMA KOHLI, J

¶21

MARCH 09, 2017 rkb/ap

¶22

RFA 185/2017 and connected appeals Page 2 of 2

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Wilson Bhati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Wilson Bhati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hasim Mansuri Vs Satish Kumar Adya

Sushil Kumar Aggarwal Vs General Manager Northern Railway & Anr.

M/S Planman Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pragnesh Patel

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs Sudeep Subaksh

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs Wilson Bhati

East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. Vs Wilson Bhati