Appeals filed by EDMC against orders were disposed of by a consent order with connected appeals, referencing a prior order dated 01.12.2016.
Appeals disposed of in terms of the order dated 01.12.2016 passed in RFA 192/2016 and connected appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10 to 15.
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR..... Appellants Through: Mr. G.D. Mishra, Standing Counsel
versus
M/S TOMAR CONSTRUCTION & CO ..... Respondent WILSON BHATI ..... Respondent SUDEEP SUBAKSH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Akhil Verma, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 09.03.2017
RFA 185/2017 and connected appeals Page 1 of 2
192/2016, being the lead case. He however states that the appellant be called upon to indicate the exact amount that would be payable to the respondents under the decree and the estimated date of payment.
HIMA KOHLI, J
MARCH 09, 2017 rkb/ap
RFA 185/2017 and connected appeals Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeals should be disposed of by consent order similar to connected appeals.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
RFA 192/2016Relied on¶2
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR
M/S TOMAR CONSTRUCTION & CO
WILSON BHATI
SUDEEP SUBAKSH
HIMA KOHLI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
