Sushma @ Shiv Devi & Ors. v. Arun Kumar
Delhi HCRC.REV./524/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.…
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether petitioner needs to be granted extension of time to vacate premises upon withdrawal of revision petition subject to undertaking.
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 524/2017, CM No.41522/2017 (for stay)
¶4
- SUSHMA @ SHIV DEVI & ORS ..... Petitioners
¶5
- Through: Mr. Rajeev Singh Chauhan, Adv.
¶6
versus
¶7
ARUN KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: None
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
¶9
O R D E R % 17.11.2017
¶10
- This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 28th July, 2017 in RC/ARC No.438/2016 of the court of Rent Controller (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi] of eviction, after full trial, of the petitioners from one shop on ground floor of property No.IX/3263, Gali No.5, Dharam Pura, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi.
¶11
- The counsel for the petitioners has been heard.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether petitioner needs to be granted extension of time to vacate premises upon withdrawal of revision petition subject to undertaking.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sushma @ Shiv Devi & Ors.
- respondent
Arun Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court