Petitioner sought to withdraw adoption-related writ petition with liberty to seek assistance from CARA regarding child welfare.
Case dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach CARA and return to court if needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
MANOJ CHANDRA AND ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Navin Kumar, Advocate. versus
CENTRAL ADOPTION RESOURCE AUTHORITY AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Suresh Chandra Sharma, Advocate for R-2 & 3. Mr Gaurang Kanth, CGSC and Ms Eshita Baruah, Advocates for UOI with Ms Jossy Cherian, Consultant CARA.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 16.11.2017
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2017/MK
Manoj Chandra
Central Adoption Resource Authority
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
