Baktawar v. Gaindo
Case brief
What is this about?
Rent Control Revision Petition challenging dismissal of tenant's leave to defend against eviction. Court examined landlord's possession regarding residential need alleged by tenant's industrial usage. Dismissed revision holding no merit. Eviction order upheld.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; order of eviction upheld.
What the court decided
- $~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. No.363/2015 & CM No.12844/2015 (for stay). BAKTAWAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Bhatia, Adv. Versus
- GAINDO ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.K. Aggarwal and Ms. Gayatri Aggarwal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R % 07.09.2017
- This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 3rd January, 2015 in E.No.6/14 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (North) District, Rohni Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner / tenant for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent / landlady and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner / tenant from one room in House no.20, Khasra No.2/10, Village Dhaka, Mukharjee Nagar, Delhi.
- The petition was entertained and notice thereof issued, though no stay of the order of eviction granted.
- The respondent / landlady executed the order of eviction and recovered possession of the portion in occupation and tenancy of the petitioner. Vide order dated 17th September, 2015 in this petition, the respondent / landlady was directed to deliver back the possession and the Rent Control Revision Petition posted for hearing. The respondent / landlady preferred SLP (C) No.27976/2015 to the Supreme Court against the said RC.REV. No.363/2015 page 1 of 3
page 1 of 3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the eviction petition filed by the landlord under Section 14(1)(e) and dismissal of the tenant's leave to defend is in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BAKTAWAR
- respondent
GAINDO
Coram
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court