The petition was disposed of subject to pending Supreme Court orders. Counsel stated that if respondents agree to pay court fees, disposal is possible, but the order remains conditional on the upcoming S.L.P. hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
RASHMI MADAN & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Adv.
Versus
NACHIKETA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumesh Gandhi, Adv. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
% 07.09.2017
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
SEPTEMBER 07, 2017 bs..
Rashmi Madan
Nachiketa Construction Pvt Ltd
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
