In person appeal by Anil Kumar Anand seeking leave to withdraw the petition dismissed as withdrawn with directive to Disciplinary Authority to apply mind to representation.
Leave to withdraw granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Disciplinary Authority directed to pass speaking order on representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 01.11.2017
The appellant who appears in person seeks leave to withdraw this appeal.
At this stage, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off accordingly.
Needless to state that the Disciplinary Authority shall apply his mind on the representation if any filed by the appellant purportedly on 11.09.2017 annexed as Annexure ‘C’ .and pass a speaking order in accordance with law and the Rules.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 01, 2017 ss
Anil Kumar Anand
Union of India
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
