MCD v. D.R.Parashar & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi listed the writ petition for further adjournment to allow the respondents to file replies to the scheme application
What the court decided
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- LPA 58/2005
MCD ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, St.Counsel with Ms.Anushruti, Advocate
versus
D.R.PARASHAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Asha Jain Madan, Advocate for R-1 to R-4 Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for LAC/L&B/GNCTD Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for DDA/R-6.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 20.02.2018
CM No.17209/2017 (by the appellant/MCD for release of the amount)
- Ms.Asha Jain Madan, Advocate appears for the respondents No.1 to 4 and states that though she has filed the reply to the application, the same has been returned by the Registry under objections. Reply filed by the respondents No.1 to 4 shall be re-filed within one week.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MCD
- respondent
D.R. Parashar
Coram
Hima Kohli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court