The Company Tax Appeal Tribunal ordered remand. Subsequently, the Transfer Pricing Officer deleted the adjustment. The High Court held the appeal rendered infructuous and dismissed it.
The appeal was rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
CORNING S.A. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep S. Karhail, Advocate
versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Luxmi Gurung, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 18.04.2017
S.MURALIDHAR, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
APRIL 18, 2017 tp
CORNING S.A.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX
S. MURALIDHAR
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
