This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
ORDER % 06.02.2017
CM 4581/2017 in FAO(OS) 35/2017 CM 4585/2017 in FAO(OS) 36/2017 CM 4608/20 17 in FAO (OS) 37/2017
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CM 4582/2017, 4583/2017 in FAO(OS) 35/2017 CM 4586/2017, 4587/2017 in FAO (05) 36/2017 CM 4609/2017, 4610/2017 in FAO (OS) 37/2017
The delay is condoned.
The applications stand disposed of.
FAO(OS) 35/2017 & CM 4580/2017 FAO(OS) 36/2017 & CM 4584/2017 FAO(OS) 37/2017 & CM 4607/2017
These appeals are liable to be dismissed in view of the judgment delivered by a Division Bench of this Court on 03.10.2016 in the case of very same appellant in FAO(OS) 103/20 16 and other connected matters.
Accordingly, the appeals arc dismissed following the decision in FAO (OS)103/2016 dated 03.10.2016 and other connected matters of the same date.
j
FEBRUARY 06, 2017 kb
iiRR1i AHMED, J 'iIiij
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FAO(OS) appeals filed by the same appellant in identical connected matters should be allowed in light of a prior Division Bench judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
FAO(OS) 103/2016Distinguished¶9
AHMED
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
