This order modifies the issues in a testamentary suit to determine the validity of a purported will dated October 5, 2010, and the appellant's entitlement to relief. The appeal was disposed of following the modification of the gravamen orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
AMRIT GAMBHIR ..... Appellant
Through : Mr Vaishali Kakra
versus
NAMRATA GAMBHIR & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr Asutosh Lohia with Mr Rahul Madhwani and Ms Soumya Kumar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J. R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 06.02.2017
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The initial dispute was
with regard to the manner in which the issues have been framed. However, the
parties agree that the issues in the testamentary case be re-framed as under:-
The orders dated 16.02.2016 and 19.09.2016 stand modified, as above.
The appeal stands disposed of.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
J. R. MIDHA, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2017 SR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the purported will dated October 5, 2010 is the last and final validly executed will of the deceased.
Amrit Gambhir
Namrata Gambhir
Badar Durrez Ahmed
J. R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
