Partly allowed
Sangita Ruhal and Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi HCFAO/285/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Single Judge disposed of the appeal against an order requiring the appellants to furnish an administration-cum-surety bond. The Court held that as the appellants are sole beneficiaries, no such bond is required.
What did the court decide?
The direction to furnish the administration-cum-surety bond was deleted; the appellants received letters of administration without the Will annexed without filing such a bond.