Disposed

Munfat & Ors. v. State

Delhi HC7 Jul 2017FAO/154/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order, hereto 3FAO 154/2007, an appeal and a petition for letters of administration regarding the estate of Alladin. The court treated the matter as not pressed, set aside the impugned judgment, and granted liberty to file a civil suit against the custodian of evacuee property to claim title under Muslim law, noting liberal consideration of limitation.

What did the court decide?

The appeal and main petition treated as not pressed; impugned judgment set aside; liberty granted to file civil suit against custodian.

Munfat & Ors. Vs State — Succession and Inheritance | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~R-15

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO 154/2007

¶4

MUNFAT & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma and Mr. N. Dogra, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

¶5

O R D E R % 07.07.2017

¶6

This first appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is filed against the impugned judgment of the court below dated 2.2.2007 dismissing the petition filed for grant of letters of administration filed by the appellants/petitioners and who are the maternal grandchildren of the deceased Alladin @ Alladia. Letters of administration was sought in the petition with respect to the properties of Alladin. The petition filed was for letters of administration without the Will annexed. FAO 154/2007 page 1 of 3

¶7

In law, a petition seeking letters of administration and consequent grant of letters of administration will only give a right to administer the asset. An order passed granting letters of administration will not entitle a person to possession of the properties in case the properties are not in possession of the person who seeks letters of administration. A civil suit would have to be filed by the petitioners even after grant of letters of administration in case the petitioner seeks possession of the property from the custodian of evacuee property, inasmuch as, the properties of late Sh. Alladin are in possession of the custodian of evacuee property. Custodian of property was not a party to the subject petition seeking letters of administration.

¶8

Accordingly, learned counsel for the appellant says that although the appeal as also the main petition seeking letters of administration be disposed of as not pressed, and which is ordered accordingly, but liberty be given and which is given, that petitioners can file a civil suit in the competent court against the custodian for seeking entitlement to the estate of late Sh. Alladin on the basis of the

¶9

page 2 of 3

¶10

FAO 154/2007

¶11

petitioner’s claiming title in the properties on account of their inheriting the properties of late Sh. Alladin under Muslim law.

¶12

Also, when a civil suit is filed, the concerned court will examine the issue of applicability of Section 14 of the Limitation Act liberally in favour of the petitioners, of course in accordance with law.

¶13

Accordingly, the appeal and the main petition for letters of administration is treated as not pressed and the impugned judgment dated 2.2.2007 accordingly will therefore stand set aside because the letters of administration case is treated as not pressed since inception.

¶14

The present appeal and the petition seeking letters of administration are disposed of as not pressed with the aforesaid observations.

¶15

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J

JULY 07, 2017

page 3 of 3

FAO 154/2007

Munfat & Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munfat & Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S V2 Retail Ltd. (Formerly Known as Vishal Retial Ltd) Vs M/S Richo India Ltd.

Gur Prasad Gupta Vs Shri Ram Prasad Gupta

Gur Prasad Gupta Vs Shri Ram Prasad Gupta

Varsani Construction Company & Anr. Vs Religare Finvest Limited

Varsani Construction Company and Anr. Vs Religare Finvest Limited

United India Ins Co. Ltd. Vs Asgari Khatoon & Ors.